Here's what's on my mind at the moment.
So, I graduated from college in June 2009, often referred to as the worst possible year to break into the print biz. But things are suddenly looking up. I'm not sure when it happened-- economists have been declaring the recession over for quite some time now-- but I am beginning to feel it firsthand, just a little more.
A trend story in today's Washington Post caught my eye. "In contrast to media industry's struggles, a boom for those who cover Congress."
I was just saying to someone the other day that it feels like wherever I go, whatever networking event, it seems that half of the contacts I meet work for Bloomberg. Why the conglomeration there? It recently added 150 journalists to its staff for the launch of Bloomberg Government, a specialized news and data publication readers can subscribe to for $5,700 a year. That could be one reason. Politico's new baby, Politico Pro, is a bird of the same feather and added more than 30 staffers to its new publication last month to keep up.
This is excellent news. Despite the crazy changing platform of journalism in the 21st century, people are still hungry for political coverage. As the story points out, Congress is front and center when it comes to some of the most hot button issues facing America today. People care. People want to feel informed. People want to weigh in.
![]() |
| Taken 3/22/11 on a stroll down to the Capitol w/ a coworker |
Think about that ratio. Gone are the days when one reporter would cover six, or 11, members of congress. Today, we see the reverse.
This allows us to really delve into our subjects and become an expert on the Congressman/woman. There are certainly perks: increased knowledge of the subject's political past, voting history, opinions, etc. But it also increases the competition.
Veteran press secretary Jim Manley says Hill reporters care more about posting a story before their competition than they do about accuracy. He lamented that sometimes, journalists would call him after posting a story to make sure they had gotten in right and fact check.
There's something to be said for speed in this industry-- everybody wants it first. But I almost fear that working on the Hill would bring out the frazzled, flustered, persistent-beyond-charming side of me that no one needs to see.
How do you survive in that fast-paced lifestyle in which the latest updates are expected of you at all hours of the day?
Simple. You have to live and breathe it and be committed to nothing else. It really seems like an art you learn to master.
I think I'm up for it.
That's all for now.
More later from the Newseum's after-hours "Night at the Museum" event tonight. Somewhere between roughing it in the Montana wilderness and house-sitting a chicken farm, my life became swanky.
xoxo
T
